2. CINEFOGO Kick-Off Conference, October 2005
Thomas P. Boje and Lars Josephsen
CINEFOGO had its Kick-Off Conference on 15-19 October 2005 at Roskilde University. All universities represented in the CINEFOGO were present at the Conference. Through four days of enthusiastic debate the scientific programme of the CINEFOGO was outlined in detail and firm commitments were made between the institutions in planning the programme for the first 18 months.
The conference included a series of opening and plenary lectures on issues related to 'Civil Society and New Forms of Governance' and the aim and scope of the CINEFOGO Network. Please find below a brief mention of these lectures.
- Dr. Bent Greve, Professor at Roskilde University, 'A European Social Model?'
- Dr. Lars Hulgård, Associate Professor at Roskilde University, Civil Society and Governance'
- Dr. Thomas Boje, Professor at Roskilde University, 'Scope and Aim of the CINEFOGO Network of Excellence'
- Dr. Claire Wallace, Professor at Aberdeen University, 'Social Capital across Europe'
- Dr. Erik Amnå, Professor at Gothenburg University, 'Still a Trustworthy Ally?'
- Dr. Marilyn Taylor, Professor at University of the West of England, 'Community Participation in the Real World'
- Dr. Paul Dekker, Professor at Tilburg University, 'Civil Society and Volunteering'
A European Social Model?
Dr. Bent Greve,
Professor at Roskilde University, outlined his reflections on 'A
European Social Model?', and asked whether there is a European model
for welfare, and whether there is a move towards a European social
model. On the basis of a comparative welfare perspective, Bent Greve
had identified and analyzed six European models of welfare, using the
triangulation between state, market and civil society as the welfare
state actors. One of the six, i.e. the socalled 'Nordic or social
democratic model' was characterized by a strong civil society. Bent
Greve stated that there a few signs of a development towards a European
welfare state model, where universalism seems to pre-vail in some areas
and where convergence can be found at a macro-level, and he argued that
institutional and organizational differences call for different roads
to welfare.
Read more
Civil Society and Governance
In his speech on 'Civil Society and Governance', Dr. Lars Hulgård,
Associate Professor at Roskilde University, addressed CINEFOGO's
concern about improving citizens' participation in governance, and he
welcomed the emerging interest in building the civil society -
governance relation into the overall strategy for the development of
the EU. Lars Hulgård outlined the complex relationship be-tween civil
society and governance with a short historical journey, with four
illustrating snapshots of periods in time, with Thomas Hobbes'
Leviathan as starting point, and then a controversy in the mid 1990s
between the two Czech statesmen Václav Havel and Václav Klaus about the
role of civil society in a modern democracy. Next snapshot included
Robert Putnam and his book 'Bowling Alone', and the last referred to
reflections of Romano Prodi on the role of the third sector
organizations as "schools for democratic participation and active
citizenship". Lars Hulgård concluded "or-ganized civil society is today
fully aware of its legitimate role as a cornerstone in the making of
European citizenship".
Read more
Aims and Scope of the CINEFOGO Network of Excellence
Dr. Thomas Boje,
Professor at Roskilde University, presented 'Scope and Aim of the
CINEFOGO Network of Excellence'. The aim is to provide knowledge about
the relationship between civil soci-ety, citizenship and social
protection in an increasingly diversified and multicultural Europe,
which also seeks greater integration of those living in Europe. The
objectives of the Network are: (1) To promote citizens' involvement and
participation in European policymaking - how to enlarge and activate
democracy and participation. (2) To understand the impact of the
different forms of citizen-ship and civic participation - how to ensure
social cohesion in an economic, socially and culturally diversified
Europe, and (3) To identify factors facilitating the co-existence of
multiple identities - how to combine recognition of social and cultural
differences with universal citizenship rights and social justice.
Read more
Social Capital across Europe
'Social Capital across Europe' is the title of a speech given by Dr. Claire Wallace,
Professor at Aberdeen University. Claire Wallace outlined the
comparative study 'Social Capital across Europe, patterns of
participation, trust and social cohesion'. The aim of the study was to
examine whether formal and informal social capital reinforce or
substitute one another. The main indicators for social capital chosen
were: generalized trust, social contacts, networks of mutual help
outside the family, and involvement in voluntary organizations. The
research is based on data from 27 EU countries, Turkey and Croatia, and
resulted in a clustering of countries around five groups. Claire
Wallace stated that the social capital study indicates that a simple
welfare regime typology does not give a sufficient picture of
differences among the European countries. Thus it is not possible to
measure social capital by the same yardstick, and that new EU countries
cannot be clustered together by so-cial capital, as they vary too much.
Read more
Still a Trustworthy Ally?
Dr. Erik Amnå,
Professor at Gothenburg University gave a lecture titled 'Still a
Trustworthy Ally? Civil Society and the Transformation of Scandinavian
Democracy'. Erik Amnå focused on the transformation democracy and of
the role of civil society in Scandinavian countries The develop-ment of
democracy and the welfare state Norway, Sweden and Denmark were
characterized by an expansion of the welfare into the sphere of civil
society, leaving it to an instrumental role of strengthening and
legitimizing the representative democracy, through political
socialisation. Erik Amnå described the role of civil society by a
series of statements, e.g. "Civil society returns due to run-away
political parties", and "As civil society returns, it speaks a new
language: the language of human rights", and he concluded "civil
society operated more as an engine in the transformation of
Scandinavian democracies than as brakes, yet it is more like lubricated
shock absorbers than a real engine".
Read more
Community Participation in the Real World
Dr. Marilyn Taylor,
Professor at University of the West of England, titled her presentation
'Community Participation in the Real World. Opportunities and Pitfalls
in New Governance Spaces'. Marilyn Taylor identified policy communities
and issues network as two kinds of groupings that have a role to play
in the policy process. Of the two, policy communities are far more
central to governing. She argued that although the new governance
spaces that have emerged over recent years are suffused with state
power, there are still opportunities for communities to become active
subjects in the governance spaces and thus to shape and influence the
exercise of government. Also issue networks have opportunities to
become active subjects. Marilyn Taylor stressed that the main pitfall
in governance is to completely overlook issue networks as possible
contributors to the revi-talisation of the democratic process. This may
happen if the institutionalised 'rules of the game' and technologies
continue to be largely framed by government actors.
Read more
Civil Society and Volunteering
Dr. Paul Dekker,
Professor at Tilburg University, gave a lecture on 'Civil Society and
Volunteering: Comparison and Questions for Further Research'. He
addressed the concepts of civil society and volunteering, and
highlighted that the concepts have various definitions due to cultural
and societal differences. After comparing volunteering in Western
Europe in the perspective of civil society (active membership) and the
non-profit sector (unpaid work), he summarized why volunteering can be
considered to be both appositive and negative factor for society.
Positive as it is supposed to make people more social, trusting and
interested in politics (cf. 'social capital' and 'political
democracy'), and negative because it replaces mutuality by service and
spreads a questionable work ethics (may imply 'avoiding politics').
Paul Dekker concluded that voluntary workers seem to grow in numbers at
the expense of active members, which is a development that several
scholars find negative.
Read more
