RECON Online Working Papers 07-10/2009
New RECON Online Working Papers: Denouncing European Integration: Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation by Hans-Jörg Trenz and Pieter de Wilde; Designing Politicization: How control mechanisms in national parliaments affect parliamentary debates in EU policy-formulation by Pieter de Wilde; Explicating social action: Arguing or bargaining? Erik Oddvar Eriksen and Civil society and EU constitution-making: Towards a European social constituency? by Hans-Jörg Trenz, Nadine Bernhard and Erik Jentges are available.
RECON Online Working Paper 2009/10
Denouncing
European Integration: Euroscepticism as reactive identity formation
Hans-Jörg Trenz and Pieter de Wilde
Abstract: This
paper highlights the reactionary nature of Euroscepticism, argues for
understanding Euroscepticism as a discursive formation in the public
sphere and points to the media as central players and amplifiers of
Euroscepticism. Hans-Jörg Trenz and Pieter de Wilde argue that in order
to describe the dynamics of Euroscepticism, we need to understand how
the polity worth of the EU is framed in public debates and how and by
whom Eurosceptic narratives are mobilized, and we need to account for
the public resonance of Euroscepticism and its dynamic expansion (the
public salience of Euroscepticism).
RECON Online Working Paper 2009/09
Designing
Politicization: How control mechanisms in national parliaments affect
parliamentary debates in EU policy-formulation
Pieter de Wilde
Abstract: In
this paper, Pieter de Wilde asks how ex ante and ex post control
mechanisms structuring the involvement of national parliaments in EU
policy-formulation affect the size and scope of conflict of
parliamentary debates. The direct and indirect effects of control
mechanisms are assessed in a comparative case study on plenary
parliamentary debates in the Danish Folketing and Dutch Tweede
Kamer on
the EU multiannual budgets, Delors II, Agenda 2000 and Financial
Perspectives 2007-2013.
RECON Online Working Paper 2009/08
Explicating
social action: Arguing or bargaining?
Erik Oddvar Eriksen
Abstract: In
this paper it is argued that reasons and norms must be given
explanatory force in social action. This requires methodological
individualism expanded to methodological interactionism, where promises
appear not merely as bargaining chips, arguing as more than an
aggregation device and normative questions not as irrational. Because
both
arguing and strategic communication exist, and it is as hard to
identify the former as the latter, one should not let one take
precedence over the other on theoretical grounds. The problem,
according to Erik O. Eriksen, is not theoretical, but methodological.
RECON Online Working Paper 2009/07
Civil
society and EU constitution-making: Towards a European social
constituency?
Hans-Jörg Trenz, Nadine Bernhard and Erik Jentges
Abstract: The
EU constitutional process has ascribed a new role to civil society not
only as a partner in governance but also as a constituent of the
emerging EU polity. Hans-Jörg Trenz, Nadine Bernhard and Erik Jentges
propose an analytical framework and a methodology of how to analyze
civil society as 'social constituency'. The research agenda is linked
to the intermediary and the representative function of organized civil
society as a transmission belt of legitimatory discourse on the EU.
The RECON Online Working Paper Series
is available
at:
http://www.reconproject.eu/projectweb/portalproject/RECONWorkingPapers.html